<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opus Research &#187; Intel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/tag/intel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress</link>
	<description>Analysis and Expertise on Voice Services and Conversational Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google to Bring Android to the TV Set With Intel, Sony (and Logitech)</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/18/google-to-bring-android-to-the-tv-set-with-intel-sony-and-logitech/</link>
		<comments>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/18/google-to-bring-android-to-the-tv-set-with-intel-sony-and-logitech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT Scans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recombinant Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/?p=2574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can't think of Google TV as anything else but Recombinant Television.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/android.jpg"><img src="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/android.jpg" alt="" title="android" width="108" height="108" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2575" /></a>I can&#8217;t think of Google TV as anything else but Recombinant Television. This time the New York Times had the scoop when reporter Nick Bilton broke the story <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/technology/18webtv.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">here</a>. Intel&#8217;s Atom processor, which powers (some say &#8220;under powers&#8221;) popular netbooks and many smartphones, will be called upon to serve as the foundation for new set-top boxes designed to bring Google&#8217;s Web-based apps to the home TV set. </p>
<p>Add Logitech to the mix and can imagine how the master of the mouse and the multi-function TV remote will finally solve some of the sticky issues that arise when a single screen is called upon to serve up video entertainment, display photos, render social networking &#8220;activity streams&#8221; and otherwise accommodate the whims of the multi-tasking, attention-challenged public. If it works as suggested, it is one of the key outcomes of taking a recombinant (rather than a unified) approach to computing and communications. The family TV is transformed not just into a media or entertainment center, but into a big screen on which all manner of icons could invoke the widgets, apps and &#8220;links&#8221; that make each of our lives what they are.</p>
<p>Like the iPad, it is a <em>tabla rasa</em> or empty slate today. It&#8217;s just neat to contemplate how it could transform TV viewing into a much more engaging or social activity. Based on the backlash surrounding Google&#8217;s Buzz (and even Wave for that matter), we can only hope that the roll-out is done in a way that reflects an understanding of the different human factors that prevail in the TV room, as opposed to at a cubicle or among the mobile phone toting public. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/18/google-to-bring-android-to-the-tv-set-with-intel-sony-and-logitech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Orange&#8217;s Curious Choice of MeeGo</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/04/thoughts-on-oranges-curious-choice-of-meego/</link>
		<comments>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/04/thoughts-on-oranges-curious-choice-of-meego/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT Scans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recombinant Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the surprise announcements from the 2010 Mobile World Congress came from a strategic alliance between Orange and Intel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/orange-logo.jpg"><img src="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/orange-logo-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="orange-logo" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1858" /></a>One of the surprise announcements from the 2010 Mobile World Congress came from a strategic alliance between Orange and Intel. The French telecom giant announced its intent to promote development and delivery of services that are optimized for devices that have Intel&#8217;s Atom microprocessors inside and leverage the Linux-based MeeGo software platform.  As Caroline Gabriel explains in <a href="http://www.rethink-wireless.com/article.asp?article_id=2726">this article in &#8220;Rethink Wireless&#8221;</a>, Orange&#8217;s initiative with Intel aims to avoid a role as big dumb pipe by promising a consistent user experience that spans desktops, laptops, handsets, TVs and (one would assume) as many combinations and permutations of user experience (UX) as the technology can enable.</p>
<p><a href="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/intel.jpg"><img src="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/intel.jpg" alt="" title="intel" width="103" height="69" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2487" /></a>I can only ask whether this trip is necessary and whether it will necessarily be effective. Atom-equipped devices running Linux-derivative operating systems are, indeed proliferating. Until the Orange announcement, MeeGo&#8217;s future was uncertain. The platform, itself, is the product of merged development efforts combining the Linux-based Maemo platform &#8211; an &#8220;open source&#8221; effort underwritten by Nokia &#8211; and Moblin (Mobile Linux) efforts initiated by Intel. </p>
<p>Application developers, integrators and software vendors are the force multipliers destined to make Recombinant Communications (RC) successful. When it comes to smartphones, for instance, applications developers have voted with their fast-moving fingers. And the results are pretty clear. In spite of Apple&#8217;s iron fisted control of the release process, the iPhone App Store offers more than 100,000 apps. That compares to Google&#8217;s 20,000 titles. Then it&#8217;s a long-distance call to the next tier of retail outlets, where RIM is approaching a five-figure total and Palm&#8217;s WebOS has just hit four figures. The proliferation of platforms will ultimately lead to &#8220;developer fatigue&#8221;. In the spirit of &#8220;Beta versus VHS&#8221; or &#8220;HDDVD versus BlueRay&#8221; it may turn out that even two is too many.</p>
<p>Even though success is by no means assured, choosing the MeeGo platform with Intel as a partner is a gamble that&#8217;s worth taking early. Orange is right to focus on the quality of user experience across multiple &#8220;screens&#8221; and, in case nobody has noticed, the iPhone OS, Android and MeeGo are all Linux variants. I&#8217;m not a coder, but I see a common denominator here. What the developer community looks for is fair-handedness in terms of support and revenue models. What users look for is consistency across multiple platforms. A service provider of Orange&#8217;s size and footprint has an opportunity to offer both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2010/03/04/thoughts-on-oranges-curious-choice-of-meego/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$10 Million Up For Grabs for Location-based Mash-Ups</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2009/11/23/10-million-up-for-grabs-for-location-based-mash-ups/</link>
		<comments>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2009/11/23/10-million-up-for-grabs-for-location-based-mash-ups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT Scans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcatel-Lucent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Location Based Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mash-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NavTeQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recombinant Telephony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/?p=1913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital mapping giant NavteQ has attracted $10 million in sponsorships as prize money for developers that are into building location-based applications. The roster of sponsors now includes (alphabetically) Alcatel-Lucent, AtlasCT, DigitalGlobe, Imagination Technologies, Intel, Microsoft, and Mobile Distillery. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/NAVTEQLOGO.jpeg" alt="NAVTEQLOGO" title="NAVTEQLOGO" width="144" height="36" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1914" />As reported in <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/prize-pool-for-2010-navteq-global-lbs-challenger-hits-record-10m-us-with-addition-of-new-sponsors-71549737.html">this press release</a> digital mapping giant NavteQ has attracted $10 million in sponsorships as prize money for developers that are into building location-based applications. The roster of sponsors now includes (alphabetically) Alcatel-Lucent, AtlasCT, DigitalGlobe, Imagination Technologies, Intel, Microsoft, and Mobile Distillery. </p>
<p>NavteQ has been holding these competitions since 2003. The mission is to foster new, creative uses dynamic positioning technology and (oh yeah) NAVTEQ® maps. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2009/11/23/10-million-up-for-grabs-for-location-based-mash-ups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

