<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Lacks Conversational Aspects</title>
	<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/</link>
	<description>Analysis and expertise on conversational access technologies</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Miller</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1943</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1943</guid>
					<description>I'm happy to chime in again here, since I've received quite a bit of e-mail on the topic of Apple's long-standing development of embedded speech processing. I think Doug's comment on avoiding &quot;dilution&quot; of the overal marketing message is correct. But that speaks directly to the dilemma confronting developers of speech-driven, mobile applications. It gets short shrift in big audiences. 

Because OSX ships with built in speech processing, I'm taking it as a given that there are some marvelous, but undemonstrated speech-enabled features that will be made manifest before product is shipped in June. In the spirit of redefining the telephone, here's wishing success to the iPhone and all its capabilities: real, imagined and instantiated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m happy to chime in again here, since I&#8217;ve received quite a bit of e-mail on the topic of Apple&#8217;s long-standing development of embedded speech processing. I think Doug&#8217;s comment on avoiding &#8220;dilution&#8221; of the overal marketing message is correct. But that speaks directly to the dilemma confronting developers of speech-driven, mobile applications. It gets short shrift in big audiences. </p>
	<p>Because OSX ships with built in speech processing, I&#8217;m taking it as a given that there are some marvelous, but undemonstrated speech-enabled features that will be made manifest before product is shipped in June. In the spirit of redefining the telephone, here&#8217;s wishing success to the iPhone and all its capabilities: real, imagined and instantiated.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug Brown</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1940</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1940</guid>
					<description>Dan - nice report and on the mark.  It seems very likely that Apple - who has plenty of speech interface experience and in-house product - has simply avoided dilution of the initial iPhone announcement by excluding a speech interface.  This allowed them to keep the focus on the innovative &quot;touch&quot; capabilities.  It would seem to be a foregone conclusion that iterative releases of the iPhone will leverage Apple's speech interface experience, and provide the enriching hands-free experience.  Regardless, I echo Terry's comments that it's great to have a design leader raising the bar on this market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dan - nice report and on the mark.  It seems very likely that Apple - who has plenty of speech interface experience and in-house product - has simply avoided dilution of the initial iPhone announcement by excluding a speech interface.  This allowed them to keep the focus on the innovative &#8220;touch&#8221; capabilities.  It would seem to be a foregone conclusion that iterative releases of the iPhone will leverage Apple&#8217;s speech interface experience, and provide the enriching hands-free experience.  Regardless, I echo Terry&#8217;s comments that it&#8217;s great to have a design leader raising the bar on this market.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry Gold</title>
		<link>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1927</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/2007/01/11/iphone-lacks-conversational-aspects/#comment-1927</guid>
					<description>I think the iPhone is great, because it puts a spotlight on design so the other handset vendors are going to have to step it up now.  That said, I agree there are some surprising features missing from the specs that have been shared this week.  I don't know how much can be added by 3rd parties either - it seems like Apple and Cingular may lock it down.  We'll see.  Thanks for the timely report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the iPhone is great, because it puts a spotlight on design so the other handset vendors are going to have to step it up now.  That said, I agree there are some surprising features missing from the specs that have been shared this week.  I don&#8217;t know how much can be added by 3rd parties either - it seems like Apple and Cingular may lock it down.  We&#8217;ll see.  Thanks for the timely report.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
